{"id":44772,"date":"2014-03-11T06:42:12","date_gmt":"2014-03-11T14:42:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/graphpaperpress.com\/?p=44772"},"modified":"2024-01-27T15:30:54","modified_gmt":"2024-01-27T23:30:54","slug":"sell-photos-online-better-than-getty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/graphpaperpress.com\/blog\/sell-photos-online-better-than-getty\/","title":{"rendered":"There are better ways to sell pictures online than Getty Images"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Getty has developed a new embedding feature that has made 35 million images available for free and photographers are furious.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We\u2019ve always kept photographers and their work at the core of our business. We are photographers. Our friends are photographers. We believe photographs, like any art or product, have a value that should not be manipulated or diluted without the consent of their creators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
By releasing its new embedding platform, Getty Images has devalued the work of hundreds of photographers worldwide – 35 million photographs that do not compensate the photographer for their unequivocal role in Getty’s data mining and advertising efforts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In an interview with the British Journal of Photography, Craig Peters, the senior vice president of business development, content and marketing at Getty Images, explains \u201cYouTube implemented a very similar capability, which allows people to embed videos on a website, with the company generating revenue by serving advertising on that video.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The question we must ask ourselves is this: Is Getty Images benefitting more from the exposure they’ll receive than the photographers whose images are made available for free? The answer is yes. Photographers on Getty don’t have a choice. The new embed program won\u2019t have an opt-out clause, forcing photographers to participate and automatically devalue their work. They are in control.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n “Photographers are livid about this” Matthew Shuey is the co-founder of GenStockPhoto, an independently owned stock photography business. “Photographers are livid about this [change],” he says. “I forsee a mass exodus of Getty Contributors looking for a new home coming soon.” He adds that many contributors said they feel betrayed because the new embed system is not what they signed up for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We believe it\u2019s important to not rely on services whose terms and regulations are subject to unexpected changes, especially when these changes directly affect the value of your artistic work and, consequently, your livelihood.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This mentality is at the heart of how we build our products. Understanding that content creators should be owners, not renters<\/strong>, is what has motivated us to bring you products like our Sell Media E-Commerce<\/a> solution and countless free and premium WordPress themes<\/a> like Stock Photography<\/a>, Chromatic<\/a> and Onesie<\/a>; products that empower you as professionals to set your own standards of value<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Matthew Shuey, Co-founder of GenStockPhoto<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\nThe value of your work doesn’t have to suffer<\/h3>\n\n\n\n